Facts About Invasive Plant Control From Environmental Coordinators

By Sandra Nelson


An environmental GIS coordinator in the satellite office based in Alaska Interior has an invasive program currently on its first operational season laying out invasive plant groups. The research team adhered to AKEPIC protocols towards developing schema, guide their field collection expedition. The research crew currently carries a top 25 invasive booklet they created with visual identifications alongside plant descriptions. These researchers also use mobile application called Alaska Weed Identification. They have downloaded this as an additional reference material. Invasive plant management New England shares additional insights and discussions.

Having worked on wetlands invasive course management into producing an HML template probability or possibility of finding distant species ensuing from human activities will make one a forest expert. One must then have to have collected all vectors he can find related unto human activities such as mowing, roads, thinning, seeding, wildfires, trails amongst others inside interest regions. Then applied HNL color codes which are composed of orange, yellow, red, into primary merged matrix distinction class.

Research crew uses ArcPad 10.3.2, making their jobs easier. This frequently collect foreign fauna presence, non presence points within what they call Weed Restriction Zones. WRZs grid tile index they created that overlays AOI at scale 1 is to 2500 per tile greatly aids towards faster mapping. This scale is chosen for its easy paper maps exportation feature team use as an additional reference guide while in field. Crew members setup template MXD to export separate PDFs using information driven pages, an invasive plants map book.

Every AOE has their own APN. APN utilized by investigators during surveys contain aerial images, HNL polygon, WRR tile indexed locations, AOI boundary locations, not counting foreign feature class indexes where crew save index points. Ultimately, plan goes throughout upload and saved by AKEPI.

Pest Management Programs where work have been neglected very long time. Until lately, program was losing financial support because many pest issues existing in lower 48 simply do not or did not exist in Interior Alaska or ignored. Since reporting requirement did not exist for invasive plants species specifically, financial support vanished into finding, documenting, eradicating them until a year ago.

In this way, mapping exertion fulfills the two purposes, both shorter period yearly venture reports along long haul detailing. Long haul detailing will be convenient following nearness nonattendance change over months centering destruction endeavors. There exist couple intrusive fauna thinks about performed a decade ago. In any case, AOIs gathered have no accessible information from those explores. It was complicated, at last futile.

Whether one track, one time monitor or over course years, management is most important. Design with future consideration. File GDB allows additional features unto dummy shapefiles not mentioning editor tracking, collection dates, exact monitoring values, consistent schematics across feature groups, feature data set allows simultaneous editing session among multiple researchers, more characters, attribute headings, larger data space.

After speaking alongside subject matter professionals on wetland ecology, opted away with coarser, still simple, metric odds finding foreign plants within AOEs. Outside activities like roadways, needed focus approach crews endeavors. Because AOEs encompass estimated million acres, approaches could prove struggling.

Matrix started simply by listing every human activity different types taking place within AOIs, including water banks, areas hit by wildfire. Prior to searching out vector, they then refined matrix only include activity types was able gather. Then ranked human activity types along high, medium, low probability whether crews had found invasives at specific locations.




About the Author: